기업의 더 효율적인 소프트웨어
선택을 위한 17년 지원 경험

codebeamer

codebeamer

codebeamer은(는) 무엇인가요?

Codebeamer는 고급 제품 및 소프트웨어 개발을 위한 애플리케이션 수명 주기 관리(ALM) 플랫폼입니다. 이 개방형 플랫폼은 제품 라인 구성 기능으로 ALM 기능을 확장하고 복잡한 프로세스를 위한 고유한 구성 기능을 제공할 수 있습니다.

Codebeamer의 엔터프라이즈급 확장성, 고가용성 및 성능, 완전히 구성 가능한 워크플로는 전 세계 제품 혁신가들이 특별히 주목하고 있습니다.

codebeamer은(는) 누가 사용하나요?

안전을 중시하는 시장의 제품 및 소프트웨어 개발자, 복잡한 기술 제품을 제공하는 데 있어 개발, 테스트 및 규정 준수를 관리할 수 있는 통합된 방법을 모색하는 혁신가를 대상으로 합니다.

codebeamer 소프트웨어 - 1
codebeamer 소프트웨어 - 2
codebeamer 소프트웨어 - 3
codebeamer 소프트웨어 - 4
codebeamer 소프트웨어 - 5

codebeamer에 대해 확실하지 않으세요? 인기 있는 대안 제품과 비교

codebeamer

codebeamer

4.1 (31)
US$1,500.00
무료 버전
무료 체험판
44
20
3.7 (31)
4.0 (31)
4.1 (31)
시작 가격
가격 옵션
특징
통합
사용 편의성
비용 대비 가치
고객 서비스 소프트웨어
US$43.50
무료 버전
무료 체험판
107
20
4.0 (98)
4.6 (98)
4.6 (98)
녹색 등급 막대는 평균 등급과 리뷰 수에 따라 결정되는 최우수 제품을 보여줍니다.

codebeamer의 다른 적합한 대안

SpiraTeam
최상위 등급 기능
버그/문제 캡처
요구사항 관리
우선순위 부여
Jira
최상위 등급 기능
문제 관리
태스크 관리
티켓 관리
JunoOne
최상위 등급 기능
시간 및 비용 추적
워크플로 관리
협업 도구
SpiraTest
최상위 등급 기능
결함 추적
대시보드
태스크 관리
Helix ALM
최상위 등급 기능
애자일 방법론
태스크 관리
협업 도구
Wrike
최상위 등급 기능
구성 가능한 워크플로
대시보드 만들기
오버타임 계산
Polarion ALM
최상위 등급 기능
버그 추적
테스트 사례 추적
테스트 실행 추적
ClickUp
최상위 등급 기능
메모 관리
태스크 관리
프로젝트 계획/일정 관리

codebeamer 리뷰

평균 점수

종합
4.1
사용 편의성
3.7
고객 서비스 소프트웨어
4.1
특징
4.4
비용 대비 가치
4.0

회사 규모(직원 수)별 리뷰

  • <50
  • 51-200
  • 201-1,000
  • >1,001

점수별 리뷰 찾기

5
23%
4
71%
3
3%
1
3%
Robert
영국의 software engineer
컴퓨터 소프트웨어, 51~200 직원
소프트웨어 사용 목적: 2년 이상
리뷰어 출처

codeBeamer ALM a powerful tool

5.0 5년 전

주석: Basically, unites the whole process of software development, from conception of the idea to realization, to QA, to release, to bug fixing, etc.

장점:

codeBeamer ALM is extremely customisable; it covers all aspects of ALM; requirements, software architecture, computer programming, software testing, software maintenance, changes, continuous integration, project management, and release management; allows multiple teams, geographically dislocated, to seemingly work on the same project; tracks every single activity in the process; has a good potential for writing good Wiki pages; has placeholder for technical documentation; practically every tracker type item has comments, attachment, description, etc.; well established links between trackers, downstream references; customisable automation, say you can generate downstream task when system requirements change to a state; completely configurable state diagrams, etc.; excellent testing framework, test cases, test sets, test runs, etc.

단점:

As with every system, the value of it depends on how much you put into it; but IMHO codeBeamer ALM has a very high potential to give you exactly what you need from an ALM tool; say there is integration with SVN, etc.; there is a danger of overcomplicating, but that is the price of very flexible customisation; if you design your process well, you should be OK, etc.

Alan
미국의 Senior Director of Software Engineering
소프트웨어 사용 목적: 1년 이상
리뷰어 출처

We invested significant effort to configure codeBeamer and realized significant benefit in return!

5.0 7년 전

장점:

Very flexible and powerful platform that can be adapted in a variety of ways to align to your process and practices for managing your application lifecycle. Expect to invest time and effort to configure the platform to meet your needs and expect significant return on your investment. Over a 6 month window we rolled out codeBeamer capabilities for: 1) Requirements Management 2) Risk Management 3) Architecture and Design Management 4) Test Management 5) Defect Management 6) Scrum Team Rituals (Sprints, Stories, Tasks, ...) codeBeamer is now our single digital system of record for the full Application Lifecycle.

단점:

It can be challenging to debug why a user is unable to execute a task given the intersection of 1) license constraints 2) project permissions 3) tracker permissions 4) field permissions

Nikolaus
독일의 Requirements Engineer
자동차, 201~500 직원
소프트웨어 사용 목적: 2년 이상
리뷰어 출처

Using of codeBeamer ALM

3.0 6년 전

주석: We are working with codeBeamer to fullfill the requirements from Automotive Spice and for this usecase the tool is very good for. Also we are working for medical products and with codeBeamer it is very simple to change the workflows from automotive projects to medical projects.

장점:

The easy way to create a traceability from the requirements to the tests.

단점:

The user management is not so easy to handle with

Zoran
독일의 SW Developer
정보 기술 및 서비스, 51~200 직원
소프트웨어 사용 목적: 6~12개월
리뷰어 출처

codeBeamer keeps one's promise other ALM's don't even dare to give

5.0 6년 전

주석: Before I joined the codeBeamer world, I worked with other ALM tools. It was really a hard time, lots of things didn't come together or were poor in performance. I remember my first steps in codeBeamer. It was like an epiphany - suddenly everything makes sense and it's really that easy to accomplish. Actually the tool supports you in collaboration and structured workflow.

장점:

Simply: it works! Seriously. I worked with other ALM tools. Either the tools didn't cover (understand) the ALM universe, or the tools were glued together resulting in diminished functionality or even failure. Supected links. Traceability browser. Test coverage. Those tools work perfectly in codeBeamer.

단점:

Sometimes it's difficult to handle WYSIWYG. Implementation is done with a third party tool (Froala) and codeBeamer is bound to its limitations and drawbacks. Usually I get my ideas realized within the HTML editor, but sometimes you have to struggle a little.

Matthias
독일의 Project Manager
리서치
소프트웨어 사용 목적: 2년 이상
리뷰어 출처

Great ALM solution for managing large number of projects

4.0 8년 전

장점:

Good agile development features including Kanban board and Scrum process artefacts Easy management of integrated SCM repositories (Git, SVN) Good handling of project templates to specify and provide organisation specific development process templates REST API for a flexible integration of CodeBeamer with other tools Improved dashboard functionalities for project and user dashboards

단점:

It would be great to get more out-of-the-box integrations with other popular parts of a development toolchain like: Slack, IntelliJ

Nikolaus
독일의 Requirements Engineer
자동차, 10,000+ 직원
소프트웨어 사용 목적: 2년 이상
리뷰어 출처

codeBeamer is very good to use it for handling/tracking requirments and to create specifications.

4.0 7년 전

장점:

Tracking the requirements Tracability between requirements Create and use the libraries Baslining of the specifications Ajust the workflows of each Tracker/department Release management SW-test reuse Change management for the requirements/test

단점:

There are tree ways to create the authorization/user-management and this is sometimes difficult because of the roles for each project. If in our template project is create a new role we have to make the input in each prject manually.

Christian
독일의 IT-Consultant
보험, 201~500 직원
소프트웨어 사용 목적: 1년 이상
리뷰어 출처

Very good ALM tool with best features of many other tools.

4.0 8년 전

장점:

* adaptability * large scale of functionality (from requirements to implementation, to testing, releasemanagement and Support) * very good documentation about codebeamer * webinars from intlant * full-text search

단점:

* too many posibilities for filtering or reporting of issues with too different features (the one you use allways needs a feature of another search functionality) * too less posibilities for dashboards (maybe changes with 8.1) * project management (ok its not the focus of this tool, but it would be nice)

Dominic
독일의 Systemmanager
소프트웨어 사용 목적: 2년 이상
리뷰어 출처

Good usedfull tool to manage a complete product development.

4.0 7년 전

장점:

This software offers a lot of functions which we use for product development. I use it for development of automotive products. Due to the huge amount of options it is easy to customize the software for your needs.

단점:

Sometimes it is not easy to find all options in the software. The menu can be interleaved so you need some time to find the option.

Michael
미국의 Systems Engineer
공공시설, 201~500 직원
소프트웨어 사용 목적: 2년 이상
리뷰어 출처
출처: SoftwareAdvice

CodeBeamer is the worst software tool ever created.

1.0 10개월 전

주석: Flat out terrible. Worst software tool I have ever experienced. JUNK!!!!

장점:

Absolutely Nothing.

단점:

The instructional videos look nothing like the actual tool. The instructional videos and the help feature for CodeBeamer are worthless. Just garbage. I can't follow any of the instructions.

Manuel
오스트리아의 CTO
컴퓨터 소프트웨어, 2~10 직원
소프트웨어 사용 목적: 2년 이상
리뷰어 출처

Good for the whole software development lifecycle with documentation

5.0 4년 전

주석: Overall I liked the product very much and it did grow very good in regards to modern UI over the time I used it. In regards of feature richness it had been very mature already when I started using it.

장점:

Highliy flexible and customizable. You can define your own processes and lifecycles and have a huge Roles & Permissions system where you can configure anything you can think of (even better than in Jira). Also you can document everything in the integrated

단점:

At least back in 2006-2012 (when I used it) the prices were made for bigger companies only (100+ employees) as the cheapest price was still very high.

검증된 리뷰어
검증된 LinkedIn 사용자
자동차, 51~200 직원
소프트웨어 사용 목적: 6~12개월
리뷰어 출처

Herramienta para desarrollo de software y ALM

4.0 2년 전

장점:

Me parece que tiene una interfaz altamente modificable que te ayuda en el proceso de la elaboración y desarrollo de un software.

단점:

En general no tengo nada en contra de la aplicación..por poner una pega sería que la gestión de usuarios es algo complicada.

Patrick
독일의 Head of IT
부동산, 201~500 직원
소프트웨어 사용 목적: 2년 이상
리뷰어 출처

A Tool for all your needs. From document exchange to requirements engineering.

4.0 7년 전

주석: All Informations and almost all processes needed for business in one software.

장점:

Multiple features along ALM and customizeability of the product. The integration of the multiple features in one product.

단점:

Features leave the product and information about that is missing. Qualtity of the .0-releases could be better.

Norbert
독일의 R&D Coordinator & Test Manager
병원 및 의료, 501~1,000 직원
소프트웨어 사용 목적: 6~12개월
리뷰어 출처

Very powerful tool, very stable, not so easy to use for non-IT persons

4.0 7년 전

주석: Complete documentation of all artefacts along the software development process, flexible workflows, full traceability, all stakeholders in the process working in the same integrated environment

장점:

very powerful, with a multitude of functionality, not only to tracker the artefacts along the software development process, but also to collect all other types of documents, manage teams, great reporting, basically any object can be described and traced in this tool.

단점:

In some parts the usability is difficult, especially for non-IT people, who are coming from a document-oriented way of working.

Romesch
독일의 Testmanager
소프트웨어 사용 목적: 6~12개월
리뷰어 출처

The codeBeamer is a great ALM tool, which difficulty lies in the first steps, a proper project setup

4.0 7년 전

장점:

It's a browser based tool and for almost every funktion a GUI or WYSIWYG is available. It includes all necessary parts for complex development project; therefore you can avoid a tool break between a classic requirement management tool such as DOORS and a test management tool. This is one advantage use codeBeamer compared to other tools on the market.

단점:

The complexity you're faced with during the first setup of a complex project. The user interface itself is easy to handle, but the working process behind the UI is not self explained. Dashboards, Reports and Trackers are loaded every time they are opened. For elements with big data this lasts quite some time. Therefore it is not helpful for newcomers to codeBeamer that the customer support only works with a ticket system. It would be appreciated also to provide a german speaking customer support.

Norbert
독일의 Testmanager
병원 및 의료, 201~500 직원
소프트웨어 사용 목적: 1년 이상
리뷰어 출처

codeBeamer Review

4.0 6년 전

주석: Complete coverage of our software development process with full traceability in a strongly regulated medical environment

장점:

The generic approach which more or less allows to define any object or artefact needed along the software development lifecycle in the tool

단점:

It is a very good tool for IT minded users, but other users may struggle with the usability and the complexity

Lukas
독일의 Software Engineering Support
소비자 상품, 10,000+ 직원
소프트웨어 사용 목적: 2년 이상
리뷰어 출처

Well working Application Lifecycle Management Tool

4.0 6년 전

장점:

+ Everything in one tool + interfaces to other tools + flexibility to adopt to own needs

단점:

user experience. one example is 3 different spots for "Save" buttons. The GUI can be confusing...

검증된 리뷰어
검증된 LinkedIn 사용자
리서치, 501~1,000 직원
소프트웨어 사용 목적: 6~12개월
리뷰어 출처

Powerful and Extendible, but needs configuration

4.0 6년 전

주석: We're using codebeamer to support the requirement management, risk management, and software development processes for medical device development. We also run Scrum in codebemaer.

장점:

Codebeamer is very powerful, because it's very flexible.

단점:

With great flexibility come a great many settings. Some of those (such as role permissions) are very tedious (and error-prone) to set up. A few buttons with macros, or a text-based interface would have been nice. Also, automation across trackers (say, tasks in user stories) can be tricky/not satisfactory.

검증된 리뷰어
검증된 LinkedIn 사용자
자동차, 201~500 직원
소프트웨어 사용 목적: 2년 이상
리뷰어 출처

Great tool

5.0 6년 전

장점:

- Easy to use - Great UI and easy to learn - Rest API

단점:

- User Management with rights and roles. - Import Export of ReqIf files.

Christine
미국의 Learning Solutions Specialist
제약, 51~200 직원
소프트웨어 사용 목적: 2년 이상
리뷰어 출처

Codebeamer offers a creative and thorough environment for us to creat and manage projects and tasks.

4.0 7년 전

주석: The ability to collaborate with my team and others, working towards the completion of tasks and projects of all sizes.

장점:

I very much appreciate the flexibility of the Codebeamer structure. The option to group items by project or by type figures greatly into our staff's needs. The ability to sort by type of item (and task) allows our team to save time and increase productivity.

단점:

I have utilized Codebeamer for several years and have yet to stumble on a hurdle or work-staller. I think it works great - as designed.

Wolfgang
독일의 Leiter
자동차, 501~1,000 직원
소프트웨어 사용 목적: 6~12개월
리뷰어 출처

lots of possibilities need to be configured first, which is almost not feasible for a new user

4.0 7년 전

장점:

a: CodeBeamer is browser based, that is very convinient b: a GUI or WYSIWYG is available for almost every function

단점:

a: unfortunately there is no german speaking customer support I can explain my problems b: dashboards, reports and trackers are loaded every time after opening - this lasts very long for elements with big data

Paul
미국의 Embedded SW Engineering Manager
소프트웨어 사용 목적: 6~12개월
리뷰어 출처

Very powerful, a bit complicated

4.0 7년 전

장점:

I like this for our requirements management that mates with test cases for a full requirements to test result traceability.

단점:

At times the interface seems a bit "clunky" and not as intuitive as desired. There are arrows in some spots and pull-downs in other spots. Once you figure out the interface things go smoothly

Eugen
오스트리아의 Software Engineer
의료 기기, 501~1,000 직원
소프트웨어 사용 목적: 6~12개월
리뷰어 출처

Easy to Use and customizeable Tool

4.0 6년 전

장점:

- Ease of Use - Service and Support available - Customizeable Tool - Variety of Functionalities - Reporting possible - Versioning System and Audit Trail

단점:

- Not possible to adapt Codebeamer to some special company's processes - Few Useability Bugs

Slawomir
독일의 Software Develooer
자동차, 1,001~5,000 직원
소프트웨어 사용 목적: 6~12개월
리뷰어 출처

Useful tool with week spots

4.0 5년 전

장점:

Good for requirement management. Integration with OFFICE, DOORS and JIRA helps a lot. Integration with GIT. Great review hub functionality. Very flexible and configurable. Stable with new featuers comming fast. Good support from Intland. Documentation available and helpful.

단점:

User interface far from good - partially confusing, partially just ugly.

Timothy
미국의 Fellow
의료 기기
소프트웨어 사용 목적: 1~5개월
리뷰어 출처

Smooth install with Validation.

4.0 7년 전

주석: Control and documentation of our development process

장점:

The configurability of this software is outstanding. For each item, you can vary the content, the workflow and the access by status, user and role to the content. We have been able to make the tools conform to our process rather than conform our process to the tool.

단점:

The various licenses control a bewildering number of grants and denials of capabilities. Some things are a great surprise.

검증된 리뷰어
검증된 LinkedIn 사용자
컴퓨터 소프트웨어, 51~200 직원
소프트웨어 사용 목적: 2년 이상
리뷰어 출처

Good management system for software development tickets.

4.0 6년 전

장점:

I appreciate the ability to link entries. We have FRS, development, and testing tickets all linked for product releases and it does a great job of helping organize that information.

단점:

I find it cumbersome to assign certain attributes. The pick lists can be difficult to search and sometimes it is hard to determine the correct choice based on those lists. It can be frustrating.