기업의 더 효율적인 소프트웨어
선택을 위한 17년 지원 경험
Helix ALM 정보
Helix ALM은 요구사항, 테스트 사례, 문제 및 기타 개발 아티팩트 그리고 해당 관계를 중앙 집중화하고 관리하는 데 도움이 됩니다.
Workflow customization, integration with source provider. Dashboards looks nice feature and allows to plan future releases.
The text editor is still functional, but it's fallen below the minimum expectations for a text editor in this day and age.
리뷰 필터(27)
Helix ALM all in one package
주석: Great, used on numerous projects. I prefer it vs a number of other tools I've used: Doors, Confluence, Jira, Jama, Matrix, Trello, Rational, and in house custom.
장점:
There are numerous packages out there but few that are all in one - one support center packages like Perforce Helix. People often forget that the biggest investment is the user's learning time and having s flexible tool with strong support and ownership is essential. Many other tool packages depend on email or user group/forum support that is unpredictable for each of the "linked" parts of the tool set. I've spend many hours to days trying to find help for problems on some of these. That said, I like that Helix in "insanely configurable", flexible and strongly supported with phone center, tutorials, examples and templates.
단점:
Round tripping items with MS tools as Word & Excel somewhat cumbersome. Editing in Helix vs familiar MS Word limited.
Powerful tool for product development, learning curve is difficult for new users (using 2015.1.2)
주석: centralized requirement, bug and test tracking with a complete audit trail of edits, as well as "easy" automatically updating trace matrices.
장점:
Captures requirements, bugs and testing all in one place, instant update so people are all using the most up to date version, easy to add new users and licenses, can update fields and text easily to better suit project needs,
단점:
Word export challenges mean that the team won't use the export feature any more and instead has to make the update twice - once in the ALM and once in our "official" word version Test case and Test Run setup isn't WYSIWIG when embedding images into test steps, greatly annoying my developers Test Run system is not adaptable to mechanical testing, where there is one test setup and then many samples to run on a simple test (like a pull test) - so we have testing in multiple places. Validation overhead for medical device software tool requirements means we can't easily update (which means we can't update without spending on re-validation) The tool is not particularly user-friendly - I've used it for years and know where almost everything is, but new users, particularly less tech-savvy ones, have an extremely difficult time moving items through the workflow and executing tests in the system.
the product is an example of an old desk top application
장점:
nothing about this product can be said to be good , it is old , cumbersome and clunky . the product needs to be refactored and replaced
단점:
poor reports - difficult to create can not have different type of issues does not really support scrum approach
Perforce 응답
7년 전
Thank you for sharing your thoughts, Tim. We're sorry to hear that your experience hasn't met your expectations. Our support team is always ready to help you and can be reached at support@seapine.com. I'd also like to follow up and learn more details about your experience (and how we can make it better). Helix ALM receives quarterly updates to both the desktop and web clients. You can use both clients with your license. Our top priority with product updates is to make it easier for you to use. It's true that you can't have different types of issues in the Helix IM module. But you can differentiate between issues using a field type (e.g. feature request or bug). Helix ALM also lets you use different item types for requirements, requirement documents, test cases, test runs, and issues. Contact support@seapine.com if you have more questions about this. -Jeni at Perforce Support
Helix ALM has the necessary core features but needs work in terms of usability
주석: Through this software, I was able to successfully document software specifications that were linked against test cases, and ultimately used for test runs. This allowed our team to much better understand just how much more work was required to be done and how far along we were in terms of the QA testing.
장점:
The software contains good functionality for linking various bits of information together between the different modules that we use (requirements, test case management, defect tracking). It's also has the flexibility to be configured to work with many different kinds of workflows (we know because we've gone through a number of different design processes over the years that we've used this).
단점:
The text editing is the portion of the software that I like the least. Copying and pasting seems to mangle linefeeds, building up a nested list of bullets has inconsistent behavior, and trying to create/edit a table is incredibly awkward. The text editor is still functional, but it's fallen below the minimum expectations for a text editor in this day and age.
It does Everything, but not always easily!
주석: It enforces a decent workflow for trouble tickets and testing.
장점:
I like that it ties everything together and if you have things set up correctly, you get great trace-ability. It is VERY powerful, and flexible.
단점:
With so much flexibility comes a LOT of configuration. And it's not always easy to modify your workflow once it's been in use for a while. I really don't like that I have to kick everyone out of the project to make the tiniest change to the workflow and events. The cost of licenses makes it hard for us to have enough for everyone.
Usage of Perforce
주석: Overall it is a very good source control tool. It also has command line tools in automation scripts.
장점:
Shelving files is a great feature for users because they are saved onto the server and if the developers system crashes or the developer left the company, other users can retrieve them.
단점:
When a new file or folder is created in a "workspace", you cannot add it until you have added the folder in the workspace configuration. It's not intuitive enough if you are a new user.
Traceability matrix and Helix general use
주석:
I do create Test cases, open issues/defects and creating documents via the tool.
Also, review and create the traceability matrix
장점:
The way the traceability is shown and connected together in one page. Adding new test cases and requirements, and supporting the while requirements flow from start to end.
단점:
In test execution , the execution itself it good, but when it comes to sample size where generally should be one Pass/Fail status, i get several results per number of samples.
Using every day.
장점:
Dashboard look great really great and have valuable information. Love issues filters. You can easily find required issue with them.
단점:
Would be better if it's not lag. Some workflow steps could be improved. One flow could be assigned to two users.
Working for more than 1 year with this tool and I am very satisfied in Helix.
장점:
The most important thing is Filters and our company using it as much as possible. Also, we are very happy about Requirements section.
단점:
Some filters during Helix Item creation are required but they are not marked as required, i.e. Impact
Difficult to set up, but quite powerful
장점:
Helix ALM is super flexible, and can be configured in just about any way you need. It can be set up to automate some steps, and when you complain, they have excellent customer support.
단점:
It is somewhat difficult to set up, and if it set up incorrectly, it is extremely frustrating to use.
Great test case/requirement management tool
장점:
I like the test case/test run model which gives the the ability to generate base tests and instantiate them using test runs. I write the test once, and generate the multiple times per feature release or sprint.
단점:
The web interface for the product is not as rich as the thin client. Would like to see that catch up feature wise.
I've been using Helix ALM over 5 years. This was a great experience of combined SCM and Helix.
장점:
Workflow customization, integration with source provider. Dashboards looks nice feature and allows to plan future releases.
단점:
Lack of HTML support in emails sent by Helix ALM. It still doesn't support inline images. Links... Links could be displayed in more user friendly view.
function rich software.
장점:
easy to sort items using catalogs, also it's very flexible software and allow to highly customize according our needs.
단점:
in issue window it's hard to see some details as they are hidden in various tabs. usually we do not notice attached additional files and number of reports.
Usefull tool but need lot of improvements
주석:
Overall this is a good Product. It need lot of improvements
1. Facelift
2. More Widgets or allow creating New Widgets using filters.
3. Ability to link multiple Projects in one Report.
4. More to come :D
장점:
Everything in one place including requirements/ test cases etc. I am still learning but not enough web content compared to JIRA.
단점:
Cannot create Dashboards that we need. Not sufficient Widgets and we cannot create any widget other than pre-defined ones. Once you create more projects, you only can generate report per projects. My team works in multiple projects and I have to write multiple reports to see the work.
Since buying the product when it was called Test Track Pro it has been a good relationship
장점:
Ease of use for IT people and Business alike. Anytime we've had a question on how to use it (thru Seapine Software) it was always answered quickly.
단점:
Reporting has always been a bit weak but we make do. We also use Test Case Management and it works out well for us also.
Easy to set up and configure
주석: Central place for our companies backlog.
장점:
Easy to set up, configure and administer. Great way to keep things organized. Keeps team on track with tasks.
단점:
Client-based application. It would be great if this was converted into a web application. Also, it can get overwhelming if you over complicate the set up.
Excellent Defect management tool
주석: Excellent tool for defect management. I had a very good experience.
장점:
We can select a bunch of defects and make changes for fields such as test owner or risk score, instead of editing each and every defects. This saves a lot of time
단점:
This tool works well in internet explorer. If they provide browser comparability for chrome too, it will be great
Helix ALM allows us to track a project from beginning stages through the upkeep and maintenance
장점:
Easy to use and customize for specific projects, easy to track specific tasks/issues to requirements and develop test cases
단점:
All features are not available using the web interface making it difficult to perform administrative tasks over the web when access a workstation on the server's network is not available
Using the TestTrac with a smal process
주석: All our Testcases on one place.
장점:
Easy to fit the processes to our needs. It is realy a good thing, that this software is so easy to fit also to smal process and deep, and complex processes.
단점:
We use a old Version form 2012, so we dont now the newest Features. This old version is not very nice and not so easy to use as it could be.
Easy to use and easy to understand
주석: Easy to use and affordable tool for requirements engineering and testing
장점:
Mostly self describing User Interface for users and the high configurability of items to make it work for a lot of different requirement types.
단점:
Even a lot is configurable, the missing of a possibility to save and distribute a view between users and specific per document reduces the usability enormous.
I use this for test case development and defect tracking
주석: Centralizes test cases and defects and makes them easier to manage.
장점:
It has a web interface so the client software does not have to be used. It is easy to use and easily customizable with custom fields
단점:
Reports are not easily exported to Word for putting test cases into our company's document template.
I have been using this software for a year and a half, and it is good in its speed and execution.
주석: Helped to automate the testing process for certain reports
장점:
Its speed and execution and its usage of different features like - sending emails, record and playback, user-defined codes are excellent.
단점:
The methodology used for recording - like Contextmenu, which makes the playback session to fail, even though the necessary objects are available on the screen. Most of the time I have to debug the tool than the software against which it is being recorded
Good software, a bit difficult to learn
주석: I was given no real formal training using TestTrack, but with some assistance from my colleagues, I was able to get up and running fairly quickly. The search could be much improved, but other features seem fairly simple and easy to use.
End user feedback
주석: I found TestTrack fairly easy to search, add, and process items within the scope of my work. It was already configured for my use and I did not contact customer support nor was I involved with the purchase.
TestTrack rocks
주석: TestTrack is crucial in not only logging all our tasks, it also is key is prioritizing our work and keeping all stakeholders informed.