기업의 더 효율적인 소프트웨어
선택을 위한 17년 지원 경험

Helix ALM

Helix ALM

Helix ALM은(는) 무엇인가요?

Helix ALM은 요구사항, 테스트 사례, 문제 및 기타 개발 아티팩트 그리고 해당 관계를 중앙 집중화하고 관리하는 데 도움이 됩니다.

Helix ALM은(는) 누가 사용하나요?

제품 개발 및 QA 팀은 Helix ALM을 사용하여 고품질 제품을 적시에 제공하고 위험을 최소화합니다.

Helix ALM 소프트웨어 - 1
Helix ALM 소프트웨어 - 2
Helix ALM 소프트웨어 - 3
Helix ALM 소프트웨어 - 4
Helix ALM 소프트웨어 - 5

Helix ALM에 대해 확실하지 않으세요? 인기 있는 대안 제품과 비교

Helix ALM

Helix ALM

4.1 (27)
US$89.00
무료 버전
무료 체험판
49
2
3.6 (27)
3.7 (27)
4.4 (27)
시작 가격
가격 옵션
특징
통합
사용 편의성
비용 대비 가치
고객 서비스 소프트웨어
US$43.50
무료 버전
무료 체험판
107
20
4.0 (98)
4.6 (98)
4.6 (98)
녹색 등급 막대는 평균 등급과 리뷰 수에 따라 결정되는 최우수 제품을 보여줍니다.

Helix ALM의 다른 적합한 대안

SpiraTeam
최상위 등급 기능
버그/문제 캡처
요구사항 관리
우선순위 부여
JunoOne
최상위 등급 기능
액세스 제어/권한
워크플로 관리
협업 도구
Jira
최상위 등급 기능
문제 관리
태스크 관리
티켓 관리
Wrike
최상위 등급 기능
구성 가능한 워크플로
대시보드 만들기
오버타임 계산
Polarion ALM
최상위 등급 기능
버그 추적
테스트 사례 추적
테스트 실행 추적
ClickUp
최상위 등급 기능
메모 관리
태스크 관리
프로젝트 계획/일정 관리
codebeamer
최상위 등급 기능
요구사항 관리
코드 프로모션
테스트 사례 추적
monday.com
최상위 등급 기능
데이터 보안
인벤토리 추적
제품 식별
Asana
최상위 등급 기능
태스크 관리
프로젝트 계획/일정 관리
프로젝트 관리

Helix ALM 리뷰

평균 점수

종합
4.1
사용 편의성
3.6
고객 서비스 소프트웨어
4.4
특징
4.0
비용 대비 가치
3.7

회사 규모(직원 수)별 리뷰

  • <50
  • 51-200
  • 201-1,000
  • >1,001

점수별 리뷰 찾기

5
30%
4
59%
3
7%
1
4%
Harold
미국의 Program Manager
의료 기기, 11~50 직원
소프트웨어 사용 목적: 2년 이상
리뷰어 출처

Helix ALM all in one package

5.0 4년 전

주석: Great, used on numerous projects. I prefer it vs a number of other tools I've used: Doors, Confluence, Jira, Jama, Matrix, Trello, Rational, and in house custom.

장점:

There are numerous packages out there but few that are all in one - one support center packages like Perforce Helix. People often forget that the biggest investment is the user's learning time and having s flexible tool with strong support and ownership is essential. Many other tool packages depend on email or user group/forum support that is unpredictable for each of the "linked" parts of the tool set. I've spend many hours to days trying to find help for problems on some of these. That said, I like that Helix in "insanely configurable", flexible and strongly supported with phone center, tutorials, examples and templates.

단점:

Round tripping items with MS tools as Word & Excel somewhat cumbersome. Editing in Helix vs familiar MS Word limited.

Shannon
미국의 Design Assurance Engineer
생명공학, 5,001~10,000 직원
소프트웨어 사용 목적: 2년 이상
리뷰어 출처

Powerful tool for product development, learning curve is difficult for new users (using 2015.1.2)

4.0 7년 전

주석: centralized requirement, bug and test tracking with a complete audit trail of edits, as well as "easy" automatically updating trace matrices.

장점:

Captures requirements, bugs and testing all in one place, instant update so people are all using the most up to date version, easy to add new users and licenses, can update fields and text easily to better suit project needs,

단점:

Word export challenges mean that the team won't use the export feature any more and instead has to make the update twice - once in the ALM and once in our "official" word version Test case and Test Run setup isn't WYSIWIG when embedding images into test steps, greatly annoying my developers Test Run system is not adaptable to mechanical testing, where there is one test setup and then many samples to run on a simple test (like a pull test) - so we have testing in multiple places. Validation overhead for medical device software tool requirements means we can't easily update (which means we can't update without spending on re-validation) The tool is not particularly user-friendly - I've used it for years and know where almost everything is, but new users, particularly less tech-savvy ones, have an extremely difficult time moving items through the workflow and executing tests in the system.

tim
오스트레일리아의 Dev Manager
소프트웨어 사용 목적: 2년 이상
리뷰어 출처

the product is an example of an old desk top application

1.0 7년 전

장점:

nothing about this product can be said to be good , it is old , cumbersome and clunky . the product needs to be refactored and replaced

단점:

poor reports - difficult to create can not have different type of issues does not really support scrum approach

Perforce 응답

7년 전

Thank you for sharing your thoughts, Tim. We're sorry to hear that your experience hasn't met your expectations. Our support team is always ready to help you and can be reached at support@seapine.com. I'd also like to follow up and learn more details about your experience (and how we can make it better). Helix ALM receives quarterly updates to both the desktop and web clients. You can use both clients with your license. Our top priority with product updates is to make it easier for you to use. It's true that you can't have different types of issues in the Helix IM module. But you can differentiate between issues using a field type (e.g. feature request or bug). Helix ALM also lets you use different item types for requirements, requirement documents, test cases, test runs, and issues. Contact support@seapine.com if you have more questions about this. -Jeni at Perforce Support

Ken
캐나다의 Senior Product Developer, Software
소프트웨어 사용 목적: 2년 이상
리뷰어 출처

Helix ALM has the necessary core features but needs work in terms of usability

4.0 7년 전

주석: Through this software, I was able to successfully document software specifications that were linked against test cases, and ultimately used for test runs. This allowed our team to much better understand just how much more work was required to be done and how far along we were in terms of the QA testing.

장점:

The software contains good functionality for linking various bits of information together between the different modules that we use (requirements, test case management, defect tracking). It's also has the flexibility to be configured to work with many different kinds of workflows (we know because we've gone through a number of different design processes over the years that we've used this).

단점:

The text editing is the portion of the software that I like the least. Copying and pasting seems to mangle linefeeds, building up a nested list of bullets has inconsistent behavior, and trying to create/edit a table is incredibly awkward. The text editor is still functional, but it's fallen below the minimum expectations for a text editor in this day and age.

Judy
미국의 Principal Engineer, Manager
컴퓨터 소프트웨어, 51~200 직원
소프트웨어 사용 목적: 2년 이상
리뷰어 출처

It does Everything, but not always easily!

5.0 7년 전

주석: It enforces a decent workflow for trouble tickets and testing.

장점:

I like that it ties everything together and if you have things set up correctly, you get great trace-ability. It is VERY powerful, and flexible.

단점:

With so much flexibility comes a LOT of configuration. And it's not always easy to modify your workflow once it's been in use for a while. I really don't like that I have to kick everyone out of the project to make the tiniest change to the workflow and events. The cost of licenses makes it hard for us to have enough for everyone.

Van
미국의 Software Engineer
컴퓨터 하드웨어, 10,000+ 직원
소프트웨어 사용 목적: 2년 이상
리뷰어 출처

Usage of Perforce

5.0 4년 전

주석: Overall it is a very good source control tool. It also has command line tools in automation scripts.

장점:

Shelving files is a great feature for users because they are saved onto the server and if the developers system crashes or the developer left the company, other users can retrieve them.

단점:

When a new file or folder is created in a "workspace", you cannot add it until you have added the folder in the workspace configuration. It's not intuitive enough if you are a new user.

검증된 리뷰어
검증된 LinkedIn 사용자
의료 기기, 11~50 직원
소프트웨어 사용 목적: 6~12개월
리뷰어 출처

Traceability matrix and Helix general use

4.0 3년 전

주석: I do create Test cases, open issues/defects and creating documents via the tool.
Also, review and create the traceability matrix

장점:

The way the traceability is shown and connected together in one page. Adding new test cases and requirements, and supporting the while requirements flow from start to end.

단점:

In test execution , the execution itself it good, but when it comes to sample size where generally should be one Pass/Fail status, i get several results per number of samples.

검증된 리뷰어
검증된 LinkedIn 사용자
컴퓨터 소프트웨어, 11~50 직원
소프트웨어 사용 목적: 1년 이상
리뷰어 출처

Using every day.

4.0 7년 전

장점:

Dashboard look great really great and have valuable information. Love issues filters. You can easily find required issue with them.

단점:

Would be better if it's not lag. Some workflow steps could be improved. One flow could be assigned to two users.

Gintaras
리투아니아의 Software Developer
원격 통신, 11~50 직원
소프트웨어 사용 목적: 1년 이상
리뷰어 출처

Working for more than 1 year with this tool and I am very satisfied in Helix.

5.0 7년 전

장점:

The most important thing is Filters and our company using it as much as possible. Also, we are very happy about Requirements section.

단점:

Some filters during Helix Item creation are required but they are not marked as required, i.e. Impact

Abraham
Abraham
미국의 Software Engineer
검증된 LinkedIn 사용자
, 51~200 직원
소프트웨어 사용 목적: 6~12개월
리뷰어 출처

Difficult to set up, but quite powerful

4.0 6년 전

장점:

Helix ALM is super flexible, and can be configured in just about any way you need. It can be set up to automate some steps, and when you complain, they have excellent customer support.

단점:

It is somewhat difficult to set up, and if it set up incorrectly, it is extremely frustrating to use.

Carlos
미국의 Software Test Engineer
컴퓨터 소프트웨어, 10,000+ 직원
소프트웨어 사용 목적: 2년 이상
리뷰어 출처

Great test case/requirement management tool

4.0 7년 전

장점:

I like the test case/test run model which gives the the ability to generate base tests and instantiate them using test runs. I write the test once, and generate the multiple times per feature release or sprint.

단점:

The web interface for the product is not as rich as the thin client. Would like to see that catch up feature wise.

Raimundas
리투아니아의 Developer
정보 기술 및 서비스, 11~50 직원
소프트웨어 사용 목적: 2년 이상
리뷰어 출처

I've been using Helix ALM over 5 years. This was a great experience of combined SCM and Helix.

4.0 7년 전

장점:

Workflow customization, integration with source provider. Dashboards looks nice feature and allows to plan future releases.

단점:

Lack of HTML support in emails sent by Helix ALM. It still doesn't support inline images. Links... Links could be displayed in more user friendly view.

Rimvydas
리투아니아의 Software Engineer
원격 통신, 11~50 직원
소프트웨어 사용 목적: 2년 이상
리뷰어 출처

function rich software.

4.0 7년 전

장점:

easy to sort items using catalogs, also it's very flexible software and allow to highly customize according our needs.

단점:

in issue window it's hard to see some details as they are hidden in various tabs. usually we do not notice attached additional files and number of reports.

Sam
오스트레일리아의 Dev team Lead
공공시설, 201~500 직원
소프트웨어 사용 목적: 6~12개월
리뷰어 출처
출처: SoftwareAdvice

Usefull tool but need lot of improvements

3.0 6년 전

주석: Overall this is a good Product. It need lot of improvements
1. Facelift
2. More Widgets or allow creating New Widgets using filters.
3. Ability to link multiple Projects in one Report.
4. More to come :D

장점:

Everything in one place including requirements/ test cases etc. I am still learning but not enough web content compared to JIRA.

단점:

Cannot create Dashboards that we need. Not sufficient Widgets and we cannot create any widget other than pre-defined ones. Once you create more projects, you only can generate report per projects. My team works in multiple projects and I have to write multiple reports to see the work.

Ken
캐나다의 Development Services Mgr
리테일, 1,001~5,000 직원
소프트웨어 사용 목적: 2년 이상
리뷰어 출처

Since buying the product when it was called Test Track Pro it has been a good relationship

4.0 7년 전

장점:

Ease of use for IT people and Business alike. Anytime we've had a question on how to use it (thru Seapine Software) it was always answered quickly.

단점:

Reporting has always been a bit weak but we make do. We also use Test Case Management and it works out well for us also.

Andy
미국의 Systems Administrator
컴퓨터 소프트웨어, 11~50 직원
소프트웨어 사용 목적: 1년 이상
리뷰어 출처

Easy to set up and configure

4.0 7년 전

주석: Central place for our companies backlog.

장점:

Easy to set up, configure and administer. Great way to keep things organized. Keeps team on track with tasks.

단점:

Client-based application. It would be great if this was converted into a web application. Also, it can get overwhelming if you over complicate the set up.

Angeline
미국의 QA
정보 서비스, 10,000+ 직원
소프트웨어 사용 목적: 6~12개월
리뷰어 출처

Excellent Defect management tool

5.0 3년 전

주석: Excellent tool for defect management. I had a very good experience.

장점:

We can select a bunch of defects and make changes for fields such as test owner or risk score, instead of editing each and every defects. This saves a lot of time

단점:

This tool works well in internet explorer. If they provide browser comparability for chrome too, it will be great

Thomas
미국의 Senior System Engineer
소프트웨어 사용 목적: 2년 이상
리뷰어 출처

Helix ALM allows us to track a project from beginning stages through the upkeep and maintenance

5.0 7년 전

장점:

Easy to use and customize for specific projects, easy to track specific tasks/issues to requirements and develop test cases

단점:

All features are not available using the web interface making it difficult to perform administrative tasks over the web when access a workstation on the server's network is not available

Alfred
독일의 Head of development Team; QA Manager
경영 컨설팅, 201~500 직원
소프트웨어 사용 목적: 2년 이상
리뷰어 출처

Using the TestTrac with a smal process

5.0 7년 전

주석: All our Testcases on one place.

장점:

Easy to fit the processes to our needs. It is realy a good thing, that this software is so easy to fit also to smal process and deep, and complex processes.

단점:

We use a old Version form 2012, so we dont now the newest Features. This old version is not very nice and not so easy to use as it could be.

Beat
스위스의 Teamleader Regulatory Affairs & Quality Management
의료 기기, 51~200 직원
소프트웨어 사용 목적: 6~12개월
리뷰어 출처

Easy to use and easy to understand

4.0 7년 전

주석: Easy to use and affordable tool for requirements engineering and testing

장점:

Mostly self describing User Interface for users and the high configurability of items to make it work for a lot of different requirement types.

단점:

Even a lot is configurable, the missing of a possibility to save and distribute a view between users and specific per document reduces the usability enormous.

Gary
미국의 Sr. Test Engineer
소프트웨어 사용 목적: 6~12개월
리뷰어 출처

I use this for test case development and defect tracking

4.0 7년 전

주석: Centralizes test cases and defects and makes them easier to manage.

장점:

It has a web interface so the client software does not have to be used. It is easy to use and easily customizable with custom fields

단점:

Reports are not easily exported to Word for putting test cases into our company's document template.

Theresa
캐나다의 Quality Analyst
석유 및 에너지, 51~200 직원
소프트웨어 사용 목적: 6~12개월
리뷰어 출처

I have been using this software for a year and a half, and it is good in its speed and execution.

3.0 7년 전

주석: Helped to automate the testing process for certain reports

장점:

Its speed and execution and its usage of different features like - sending emails, record and playback, user-defined codes are excellent.

단점:

The methodology used for recording - like Contextmenu, which makes the playback session to fail, even though the necessary objects are available on the screen. Most of the time I have to debug the tool than the software against which it is being recorded

Amy
미국
소프트웨어 사용 목적: 제공되지 않음
리뷰어 출처

Good software, a bit difficult to learn

4.0 8년 전

주석: I was given no real formal training using TestTrack, but with some assistance from my colleagues, I was able to get up and running fairly quickly. The search could be much improved, but other features seem fairly simple and easy to use.

Elwanda
미국
소프트웨어 사용 목적: 제공되지 않음
리뷰어 출처

End user feedback

4.0 8년 전

주석: I found TestTrack fairly easy to search, add, and process items within the scope of my work. It was already configured for my use and I did not contact customer support nor was I involved with the purchase.

Jarrad
미국
소프트웨어 사용 목적: 제공되지 않음
리뷰어 출처

TestTrack rocks

4.0 8년 전

주석: TestTrack is crucial in not only logging all our tasks, it also is key is prioritizing our work and keeping all stakeholders informed.