기업의 더 효율적인 소프트웨어
선택을 위한 17년 지원 경험

qTest 사용 후기 및 리뷰

4.4 (26)

qTest 정보

qTest는 개발 및 테스트 방법론을 실시간으로 시각화하고 제어하는 테스트 관리 플랫폼입니다.

qTest 자세히 알아보기

장점:

Integration seems to be easy and possible with requirements and Jira.

단점:

Sometimes, the requirements between qTest and JIRA did not sync well. There were many times where the number of requirements in each software was not the same.

qTest 등급

평균 점수

사용 편의성
4.4
고객 서비스 소프트웨어
4.2
특징
4.3
비용 대비 가치
4.4

추천 가능성

8.0/10

qTest은(는) Capterra에서 26개의 사용자 리뷰를 기준으로 별 5개 중 평균 4.4점을 받았습니다.

qTest을(를) 사용해 본 적이 있나요?

귀하의 사용 경험을 다른 소프트웨어 구매자에게 알려주세요.

리뷰 필터(26)

Senthilkumar
Senthilkumar
미국의 Software test Specialist
검증된 LinkedIn 사용자
정보 기술 및 서비스, 10,000+ 직원
소프트웨어 사용 목적: 1년 이상
리뷰어 출처

Perfect tool for Agile management

5.0 4년 전

주석: Really well versed usability of the tool in the project. Used almost all the features mentioned in pros, helpful for scrum meetings, getting updates on time, good understanding of the names in tool like release, sprint, labels, etc., Reporting was very colorful for effective presentation, user management is very easy across projects.

장점:

Perfectly fit for agile projects, story board, customization of the product, reporting, bug management, reporting and analysis, user management, project milestones, color coding, flexible to upload/link attachments, shortcut keys for accessing items, integration with other market tools like blueprint, microsoft azure, caliber, etc.,

단점:

I liked all the features, least item is managing API code with postman tool and other coding features.

Analia
아르헨티나의 Ssr. QA Tester
보험, 1,001~5,000 직원
소프트웨어 사용 목적: 2년 이상
리뷰어 출처

A Great tool to manage all QA cycle

5.0 2개월 전 신규

주석: it has been a great experience to work with QA tasks

장점:

Its easy integration with different tools such as JIRA and the way it allows to manage test cases, requirements, bugs and everything related to SDLC

단점:

It becomes slow to run Insights queries when you have many projects selected

Noah
미국의 Technical Consultant
컴퓨터 및 네트워크 보안, 501~1,000 직원
소프트웨어 사용 목적: 1~5개월
리뷰어 출처

Review of qTest

3.0 6년 전

장점:

The software was integrated with qTest to bring over requirements and create test cases and execute them in qTest. We were able to run queries to find specific modules and run specific test cases. We were also able to effectively track which test cases had been executed and the result of those test cases. Then, qTest created helpful infographics to help us further track how far along in the test execution process we were.

단점:

Sometimes, the requirements between qTest and JIRA did not sync well. There were many times where the number of requirements in each software was not the same. Along with this, some of the qTest add-ons such as Insights are very difficult to work with and not intuitive as normal data analysis tools.

Paulo
아르헨티나의 Sr. QA Automation Engineer
보험, 1,001~5,000 직원
소프트웨어 사용 목적: 2년 이상
리뷰어 출처

Great Test Cases Management tool

5.0 3개월 전

주석: Great experience to track test cases executions, and bugs integration with JIRA

장점:

Its integration with JIRA and the capabilities it provides to execute test cases

단점:

Slowness to run queries using Insight module

Luis
미국의 Software QA Engineer
교육 관리, 10,000+ 직원
소프트웨어 사용 목적: 2년 이상
리뷰어 출처

고려된 대안:

Great Testing Management for the Software QA engineers and Managers.

4.0 2년 전

주석: We moved from HP ALM over to qTest few years ago; it has been for us from night to day. The integration of the tool with Jira has helped the team to improve quality overall.Great to control the quality process and improve our test case development process

장점:

The ease of use.Be able to copy/paste images to test cases steps.Version control.Execution process.

단점:

Application updates for patching existing issues and new features takes way too long to wait.

검증된 리뷰어
검증된 LinkedIn 사용자
컴퓨터 소프트웨어, 201~500 직원
소프트웨어 사용 목적: 6~12개월
리뷰어 출처

Lots of functionality

4.0 6년 전

주석: Have only been using this for about 6 months now and haven't really gotten used to all of the functionality. I believe I am not utilizing all of the functionality, need to take some time aside and learn about more of the bells and whistles.

장점:

This software integrates with The Atlassian Jira software pretty well. I can select the Story or Bug that is imported from Jira to a test script and then the text execution data will be displayed in Jira. The catch is that unless you have a qTest license you can't see the actual details of the test when you click on it. You can also click the little create bug button while running a test case in qTest and it will automatically create the Bug in Jira and populate as much data as it can from the current test case.

단점:

I'm not sure if it is our implementation - but it seems to hiccup often, I randomly get errors or steps don't display. My problem is that I sometimes forget to click the Save button and I walk away and if the session times out - then all your work is lost.

Sourabh
인도의 QA Analyst
정보 기술 및 서비스, 5,001~10,000 직원
소프트웨어 사용 목적: 2년 이상
리뷰어 출처

Great Product

5.0 5년 전

주석: Its helping in ease of doing business and run the agile environment in a smooth way

장점:

I have been using qtest for a while and I really like it the way it has built up. The integration with jira allows to link JIRA issues against the Qtest which is helpful in overall visibility.

단점:

The recent removal of precondition/Prerequisite field I didn't like it. In recent version the test pre requisite you cannot add.

검증된 리뷰어
검증된 LinkedIn 사용자
보험, 10,000+ 직원
소프트웨어 사용 목적: 1년 이상
리뷰어 출처

My Review of qTest-Test Management Tool

5.0 2년 전

주석: Overall experience excluding minor hiccups, network issues,was excellent. It provides a variety of options for test management both for Manual or Automation.

장점:

Intuitive UI,COLOR CODING, INTEGRATION WITH tools like JIRA, creates a clear link between the test case and the JIRA story assigned. Provides multiple ways to create or upload test cases.Test design is satisfactory when created using qTest .

단점:

Requirement mapping,for same items belonging to a particular story you still have to manually tag every item with the story.Frustrating. Also unit level management seems quite old and time consuming.

검증된 리뷰어
검증된 LinkedIn 사용자
컴퓨터 소프트웨어, 501~1,000 직원
소프트웨어 사용 목적: 1년 이상
리뷰어 출처

a cloud based good test management tool

4.0 6년 전

주석: Overall very good from features but slightly overpriced.

장점:

QA Symphony did a pretty good job by packaging most of the test management capabilities into it. Starting with its capability to import test cases from Excel spreadsheets or other tools is great. Other notable feature includes complete control over requirement management and traceability and easy to use UI etc.

단점:

It is highly priced compared to other competitors. Features: lacks a Rich Text Editor option in requirement management module.

Kathy
Kathy
미국의 Design V&V Engineer
검증된 LinkedIn 사용자
금융 서비스, 51~200 직원
소프트웨어 사용 목적: 무료 체험판
리뷰어 출처

Agile Test Management

4.0 4년 전

주석: We are trying to replace HP ALM because it's only compatible with an old IE version, has TERRIBLE UI and disrupts a lot of our workflows. If qTest were a more reasonable cost, we would seriously consider implementing this agile test management suite.

장점:

I like how easy it is to save work, the intuitive UI and the color scheme for quick status checks. The layout is straightforward like Rally's and it can be a requirements repository. Integration seems to be easy and possible with requirements and Jira.

단점:

I didn't like how many steps it seems to take to set up the test plan folders. Our testing is pretty rigorous and used for FDA - approved medical devices so that some of the default workflows and fields are not robust enough. I don't like that the Actual Results field can be left blank as long as you select a test status.

Richard
영국의 Test Engineer
정보 기술 및 서비스, 51~200 직원
소프트웨어 사용 목적: 6~12개월
리뷰어 출처

Useful for test traceability, good integration with JIRA

4.0 5년 전

장점:

The software has a good workflow allowing traceability of requirements right through to individual test runs. It is easy to separate releases and produce reports on test summary once finished.

단점:

The UI looks unappealing and third party automation tools are generally not supported, as Tricentis want you to use Tosca for automation with qTest integration. We use Ranorex in our team and unfortunately this cannot hook up into qTest.

Pooja
인도의 Test Analyst
정보 기술 및 서비스, 10,000+ 직원
소프트웨어 사용 목적: 6~12개월
리뷰어 출처

Over all Qtest is good, easy to use tool

4.0 2년 전

장점:

Easy to use.Copy, paste & moving is simple

단점:

Not much features for automation testing

검증된 리뷰어
검증된 LinkedIn 사용자
, 201~500 직원
소프트웨어 사용 목적: 1년 이상
리뷰어 출처

Great for our current needs, but could use some improvements

4.0 7년 전

장점:

I like the integration with JIRA, so we can import requirements into qTest just by tagging them on our JIRA board. From there we can have them organized by team and by sprint. Being able to search by requirement is the most useful feature for me.

단점:

The UI is a little counterintuitive. To add test cases to a test suite you have to click the 'Statistics' tab then you have the option to add tests. Still don't understand why they named it that.

Rahul
미국의 Lead QA
정보 기술 및 서비스, 5,001~10,000 직원
소프트웨어 사용 목적: 2년 이상
리뷰어 출처

Great product for Test Management

5.0 5년 전

주석: qTest Solved our main purpose of test management. Additionally, Jira integration helped to continue existing tools.

장점:

Ease of operation. Uploading TC, Execution, Releases, Jira Integration

단점:

Some times the slow response, nice to have automated test execution reports on email

검증된 리뷰어
검증된 LinkedIn 사용자
정보 기술 및 서비스, 51~200 직원
소프트웨어 사용 목적: 1년 이상
리뷰어 출처

Our one stop shop for QA

4.0 6년 전

주석: Overall, I really like using this software. It has the Jira integration, test case creation, test execution sections and good reporting features. We run everything through qTest and export results to Confluence so others have visibility into the work we are doing.

장점:

I love the Jira integration. We run all our requirements through Jira and import them into qTest when we can link all our test cases to them.

단점:

The out of box reporting is lacking some basic features that you would think come standard.

Gerardo
Gerardo
미국의 QA Analyst
검증된 LinkedIn 사용자
컴퓨터 소프트웨어, 501~1,000 직원
소프트웨어 사용 목적: 1년 이상
리뷰어 출처

Qtest for test scripts design

4.0 5년 전

주석: I use Qtest daily for test script creation and execution. I can see my execution in Jira so I can keep track of my completed tasks. I would recommend this software to other QA analysts.

장점:

-Easy to use -Integration with Jira is the main reason we use this -Test Script creation

단점:

-Minor bugs when saving a test script could be fixed -If you copy from word or any other source, the text is not always displayed correctly

Andreea
루마니아의 Tester
항공사/항공, 10,000+ 직원
소프트웨어 사용 목적: 1년 이상
리뷰어 출처

Great test management tool

5.0 3년 전

장점:

I am using it daily and love the fact that you can integrate it with Jira. So you can connect the requirements with the test cases. It is easy to use, has a lot of great features. You can export/import test cases in excel/word.

단점:

Maybe the fact that the refresh is taking some time.

Jess
미국의 Test Engineer II
컴퓨터 소프트웨어, 201~500 직원
소프트웨어 사용 목적: 2년 이상
리뷰어 출처

qTest is Quality for Testing

5.0 5년 전

장점:

Easy to use and understand Good Support and Training sessions

단점:

qTest Insights didn't have the best options for displaying data/test cases.

Surya
미국의 qa
운송/트럭/철도, 10,000+ 직원
소프트웨어 사용 목적: 2년 이상
리뷰어 출처

Overall good

4.0 5년 전

장점:

Documenting all the test scenarios and regression test results with bug attached

단점:

The jira integration sometimes not working

Pavan
미국의 Scrum Master
정보 기술 및 서비스, 1,001~5,000 직원
소프트웨어 사용 목적: 1년 이상
리뷰어 출처

Amazing software for QA!

4.0 2년 전

장점:

Absolutely love the integration with Jira so that we can track all test cases for each requirement

단점:

Would like for it to be more user friendly for those that are not in the QA role

Josh
미국의 Quality Assurance Analysy
운송/트럭/철도, 1,001~5,000 직원
소프트웨어 사용 목적: 6~12개월
리뷰어 출처

Gets the job done

5.0 5년 전

주석: We use qTest to write test cases and test plans and track them to completion. It also integrates with our Jira platform for defects which is very handy.

장점:

It's quick and concise, easy to use and is very intuitive for what you may need to do with it.

단점:

There are some minor hassles like dragging to reorder things being finicky but that's more of a minor nitpick.

검증된 리뷰어
검증된 LinkedIn 사용자
정보 기술 및 서비스, 10,000+ 직원
소프트웨어 사용 목적: 6~12개월
리뷰어 출처

qTest

5.0 2년 전

장점:

We are using qTest for tracking and creating our Test cases and User Stories and also for keeping a track of bugs

단점:

The thing that I don't like about this software is that sometimes it works really slow

Flora
캐나다의 Software specialist
정부 행정, 5,001~10,000 직원
소프트웨어 사용 목적: 1년 이상
리뷰어 출처

Software functions

4.0 5년 전

주석: We carry out the testing of business flow of the new system, and help users familiarize new system.

장점:

Video record function is amazing and outstanding when we compare it to similar products. It can make script creation automated.

단점:

Navigation is a little complepicated for normal users. Foturnately we have got excellent technical support from the vendor.

검증된 리뷰어
검증된 LinkedIn 사용자
정보 기술 및 서비스, 51~200 직원
소프트웨어 사용 목적: 1~5개월
리뷰어 출처

qTest is the best!

5.0 2년 전

주석: Overall, I find qTest a valuable test management tool. It is time-saving to do batch approvals on large numbers of test cases. Also, creating the parameters further defines the requirements, which facilitates test design and creation.

장점:

qTest is very useful when creating and executing large batches of test cases, especially when running the same test cases in different environments. This saves time and effort, great feature!

단점:

Could use graphics to show test coverage and progress, rather than just a percentage report.

Rupa
영국의 QA Engineer
병원 및 의료, 51~200 직원
소프트웨어 사용 목적: 1~5개월
리뷰어 출처

Its a nice tool for test management with good support available online

4.0 9개월 전

주석: Its is nice for test management. There is a lot of online support available.

장점:

Its easy to use and its feature to record and create tests

단점:

The copying of folders across modules. Also its not good for requirement management and hence creating test traceability